[Green-Activist] Inappropriate language on this mailing list.
frank
wetherbystn at bigpond.com
Thu Apr 5 10:25:26 EST 2007
The problem was Roy, i might just be dumb, (i don't think so though), but i
couldn't figure out what the point of the original post was. Even though u
didn't directly say u didn't like the "f" word, that was all i could see
that u might have been on about.
I could do a Paulene Hanson on u and say. "please explain", but unless it
really matters, we'll just let it go.
What d ya reckon?
By the way, re letters to the ed in original post. None of what u wrote
were the tips i gave u. What u wrote about short and sweet is what the
papers say. If i'm writing a letter it's exactly as long as i want it to
be. It'll still get published in it's entirety.
frank brown
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy Garner" <rrgarner at bigpond.net.au>
To: "maillist for Green Activists" <green-activist at lists.altnews.com.au>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Green-Activist] Inappropriate language on this mailing list.
> Hi, Frank
>
> Did I effing say I didn't like the effing word?
> Well, that's effing news to me.
> Roy
> ...
> Point is it's okay if you're a Peter effing Carey writing about Ned
> effing Kelly.
> But if you wish to be an expletive deleted, you'll find your sweet
> words defeated!
>
>
> On 02/04/2007, at 2:40 PM, frank wrote:
>
>> Hip! Hip! Hooray. Roy.
>>
>> What's the point? U don't like the "f" word? Shame. But i can
>> assure u,
>> u're not the majority. Most people couldn't care less.
>>
>> frank brown
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Roy Garner" <rrgarner at bigpond.net.au>
>> To: "maillist for Green Activists"
>> <green-activist at lists.altnews.com.au>
>> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Green-Activist] Inappropriate language on this mailing
>> list.
>>
>>
>>> Hi, Frank
>>> To get your letters to the editor published, make them short, sweet
>>> and
>>> preferably so devoid of detail that they can be classified an 'opinion
>>> piece'. I've had plenty printed in my time, and it's a wonder that
>>> most have been printed in their entirety (some very long, like my
>>> letter of Simon Townsend's view that anti-Vietnam war activists didn't
>>> end the war--which is, of course, why we held demonstrations outside
>>> Victoria Barracks when he was imprisoned there!!).
>>> So the wisdom on how to get letters published is largely lost on me.
>>> We all know where to get our letters published these days, and the
>>> printed media can go hang! By all means, submit them to the dailies
>>> so
>>> that the letters editor can feel rotten when they refuse to publish,
>>> but go to indymedia, substantiate your claims, give links, keep the
>>> discourse above the waistline...
>>> Frankly, I think liberally sprinkling you prose with the f word is a
>>> kind of phony proletarianism. Most people turn off when you start to
>>> throw it at them!
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>> On 02/04/2007, at 12:42 PM, frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which message are u referring to Clemens?
>>>>
>>>> Are u referring to the one where i used the "f" word? If so, that's
>>>> exactly
>>>> what i'm on about in my reply to Roy's post re Nazis. Millions of
>>>> Australians don't find the word offensive. Instead we see it as a
>>>> very
>>>> descriptive term to describe an extremely bad situation, a sex act
>>>> and
>>>> a way
>>>> to express an urgent request. eg "f off". However, there are
>>>> intolerant
>>>> people who object to the use of the word, because of some warped
>>>> view.
>>>>
>>>> I maintain, that while they are allowed to hold those views, they are
>>>> not
>>>> allowed to force their views on the rest of us. They must accept the
>>>> fact
>>>> that we don't hold these views.
>>>>
>>>> U will, however note that i don't use that kind of language often.
>>>> Only
>>>> when a point needs to be emphasized.
>>>>
>>>> Although from the thrust of your post, i get the impression that u
>>>> are
>>>> talking about more than that particular post. Much along the lines
>>>> Chris
>>>> attempted to use. "worrying"
>>>>
>>>> The people i was "short", (i never swore at them), with were all
>>>> having a
>>>> go at me personally, not debating the issues i raised. Or even
>>>> worse,
>>>> coming back with absurd arguments. Despite this, i gave Roy tips on
>>>> how to
>>>> get his letters to the editor published, debated their arguments, and
>>>> answered any criticisms i was going to bother with.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore i think picking on me, only, is a bit harsh. And, yes, i
>>>> believe
>>>> u are, in the nicest possible way, of coarse, asking for, "censorship
>>>> (ouch...) on this mailing list."
>>>>
>>>> frank brown
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Clemens Vermeulen - Listmaster" <listmaster at altnews.com.au>
>>>> To: "maillist for Green Activists"
>>>> <green-activist at lists.altnews.com.au>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 1:21 PM
>>>> Subject: [Green-Activist] Inappropriate language on this mailing
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Message especially for Frank...
>>>>>
>>>>> While I generally appreciate your contributions to this
>>>>> green-activist
>>>>> mailing
>>>>> list I must admit that I have been frequently taken aback over the
>>>>> language
>>>>> you choose to use in your posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> In general standards in Australia are slipping fast. The fact that
>>>>> standards
>>>>> have deteriorated over the years in my mind does not give you
>>>>> licence.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you would take the time to develop your argument without having
>>>>> to
>>>>> revert
>>>>> to outright profanities I suggest people would value your posts and
>>>>> your
>>>>> position more.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not wish to impose moderation or censorship (ouch...) on this
>>>>> mailing
>>>>> list. Your message today makes it hard for me to wholeheartedly
>>>>> maintain
>>>>> that
>>>>> position.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please consider.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a great weekend,
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clemens Vermeulen
>>>>> Listmaster
>>>>> Alternative News Network
>>>>> listmaster at altnews.com.au
>>>>>
>>>>> contact: http://clemens.vermeulen.id.au/contact
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner
>>>>> at http://lists.altnews.com.au/MailScanner.html ,
>>>>> and is believed to be clean.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Green-Activist mailing list
>>>>> Green-Activist at lists.altnews.com.au
>>>>> http://lists.altnews.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/green-activist
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/742 - Release Date:
>>>>> 4/1/2007
>>>>> 8:49 PM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner
>>>> at http://lists.altnews.com.au/MailScanner.html ,
>>>> and is believed to be clean.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Green-Activist mailing list
>>>> Green-Activist at lists.altnews.com.au
>>>> http://lists.altnews.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/green-activist
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by MailScanner
>>> at http://lists.altnews.com.au/MailScanner.html ,
>>> and is believed to be clean.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Green-Activist mailing list
>>> Green-Activist at lists.altnews.com.au
>>> http://lists.altnews.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/green-activist
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/742 - Release Date:
>>> 4/1/2007
>>> 8:49 PM
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner
>> at http://lists.altnews.com.au/MailScanner.html ,
>> and is believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Green-Activist mailing list
>> Green-Activist at lists.altnews.com.au
>> http://lists.altnews.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/green-activist
>>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner
> at http://lists.altnews.com.au/MailScanner.html ,
> and is believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Green-Activist mailing list
> Green-Activist at lists.altnews.com.au
> http://lists.altnews.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/green-activist
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/746 - Release Date: 4/4/2007
> 1:09 PM
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner
at http://lists.altnews.com.au/MailScanner.html ,
and is believed to be clean.
More information about the Green-Activist
mailing list